Now, if only North America would catch on.
Laws & Regulations
Canada Beyond 150: Policy For An Inclusive Future was a 10-month program “Championed by the Privy Council, and delivered by Policy Horizons Canada” in June of 2017. They gathered a Canada-wide group of federal public servants to ‘support leadership and skills development’, and ‘drive culture shift across the public service’.
Trudeau ultimately wants to silence democracy, because democracy is not leaning in his favor. Well, Canadians are fed up, and have had enough of this bullshit. Sign here.
I was genuinely shocked after seeing this video. I mean, I knew that this was what was happening.. but I didn’t expect them to out-right come out and say it. (‘Kudo’s’ to them for being open and transparent about it for once, though!) In the video, Joe from Global News calls in asking a question …
 In the first place we grant to God and confirm by this our present charter for ourselves and our heirs in perpetuity that the English Church is to be free and to have all its rights fully and its liberties entirely.
I stumbled across this website where you can see court files submitted to the government for the US. Advanced RECAP Archive Search for PACER – CourtListener.com Create alerts, search for and browse the latest court opinions, PACER documents, judges, and oral arguments. Updated automatically with the latest court documents. An initiative of Free Law Project. …
J.P. Morgan Chase, Microsoft, Facebook, Coca-Cola, Citigroup, Hilton, Duke Energy, Marathon Petroleum, and United Parcel Service (UPS) are also among those that have suspended contributions to political parties.
“Everyone thinks of China’s social credit system as some sort of Black Mirror episode, while others compare it the the FICO score in the USA. It’s much, much more than that.”
“Under the Australian Biosecurity Act 2015, refusers of coronavirus vaccination in Australia could be at risk of five years imprisonment and/or a $66,600 fine.”
He refused to impose any consequences on them for breaking the law and lying to the court. Instead, he developed a pseudo-legal test that gives judges full discretion to accept the evidence if it is in the “interest of the community [because of] the seriousness or imminence of a threat to the security of Canada.